How To Win at the Content Creator Casino

CREATOR NEWSLETTER


Let the record show, I love a good conference. And this month, creators and brands have been flocking to Las Vegas, first for the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) last week, then for Creator Economy Live this past week, followed by the AVN Awards at the end of the month. Iā€™ve been here since last Tuesday and want to die; I do not recommend anyone spends more than 72 hours in this town if they donā€™t absolutely have to. I will not be staying for AVN this year. 

These conferences have been staples of the digital media industry for over a decade. CES spent the last 20 years morphing from a geeky trade show to a media spectacle, primarily because tech journalists realized they could show up at these shows and get a sneak peek at what the big tech companies were planning on launching for the year. Once the journalists caught wind of it, the advertising, PR, and marketing teams took over, carefully designing each companyā€™s presence with enormous booths on the show floor, lavish dinners for invited guests and clients, and all the debauchery that comes with inviting sales and marketing people to Vegas on a company card. More unsavory details can be found on my personal blog if youā€™re that curious.

CES is considered ā€œbusiness to businessā€ or B2B, meaning the only attendees are supposed to be corporate executives who have the authority to negotiate on behalf of their tech company. Journalists always got a pass because their presence was a net positive for the consumer electronics companies, the fawning coverage helped boost sales and public excitement for a thinner screen or a higher frame rate. Because most of the companies there are ā€œConsumerā€ Electronics companies, their business model is considered ā€œbusiness to consumerā€ or B2C, so the press played an integral role in generating that public consumer interest.

Except! Now most media consumption isnā€™t happening in traditional press outlets or networks, itā€™s happening on social media. Brands and companies are wise to this, which is why TikTok threw two separate parties for their advertising clients at CES this year. Creators flooded the showroom floor to give their followers a live look at the event, they were invited to act as spokespeople, and some were even there showing off their own consumer products.

This blurring of the consumer/business line impacts creators in both positive and negative ways. On the plus side, creators are getting access that was once gatekept by tech journalists, and thereā€™s good money to be made by partnering with brands that align with your own audienceā€™s niche interests. To wit, I met Sophie Lightning this week at Creator Economy Live, she was Nerfā€™s first Chief TikTok Officer. She got that job simply because her love of posting Nerf fan videos caught their marketing teamā€™s attention, and she was hired right out of college as an ā€œin-houseā€ creator.

On the flip side, while some creators are able to navigate the confusion of marketing org charts, most arenā€™t aware that there is likely a person (or team of people) employed at their favorite brand whose only job is to find and work with creators. The best way to meet those people is to come to conferences like CES and Creator Economy Live, but self-funding a trip to Vegas is expensive and can be a literal gamble. You can always try to find them on LinkedIn and slide on in, but itā€™s so much better to get facetime with these people.

And that was primarily the theme of Creator Economy Live. This particular conference is mostly geared towards brands and marketers who are trying to figure out how to build an ā€œinfluencer strategyā€ for their company, so most of the panels centered around things like ā€œbuilding content calendarsā€ and ā€œmeasuring success.ā€ There was also a good amount of chatter about AI, the next frontier of ā€œuserā€ generated content, aka UGC, that these brands will spend gobs of money on. (Has anyone coined AIGC yet? Calling dibs on it.) 

But before the brands stoop to cutting creators out of the picture entirely, they are desperate to find you and work with you (assuming your audience and their consumer profile are aligned). Companies like #paid were on-site to help make this process simpler, and itā€™s no surprise that the two executives I met from that company were former CondĆ© Nast salespeople (from the same team that I used to throw CES craps with 10 years ago). They realized that selling Wired ads to an advertiser is pretty similar to selling a creatorā€™s TikTok presence, so theyā€™re using their understanding of the media industry to make it simpler for their roster of creators to get #paid. Sign up for creators is free, but I canā€™t find their commission rates listed on their website, a level of transparency we can only hope for from most creator marketplaces.

Furthermore, these solutions are not end to end. #paid can get you some visibility with the brands you could potentially partner with, but unlike CondĆ© Nastā€™s creators/journalists, the creators who work with #paid donā€™t receive healthcare, time off, or a stable paycheck. Thatā€™s the trade off. Brands donā€™t have to pay publishers or agencies for bloated advertising production anymore, now they can pay the creators a much lower rate, one that doesnā€™t include padding for benefits, executive compensation, or sales commissions.

In Vegas, you canā€™t beat the casino. Their entire business model is predicated on you not understanding how hard theyā€™ve made it for you to win. Like, did you know that ā€” traditionally ā€” if you got a blackjack while playing blackjack, the casino would pay you $3 for every $2 you bet? So for a $10 bet, youā€™d get $15 in winnings (so the payout is $25). 

In the last few years, however, casinos have subtly changed the rules so that blackjack pays $6 for every $5 you bet, so instead of your $10 blackjack being worth a $25 payout, your new win is just $22. That minor difference in payout has huge implications for your success rate at the game, and every automatic card shuffler or increased number of decks means your odds of winning get smaller, despite you never really fully grasping how each of those variables impacts your earnings. Just this week, I saw multiple roulette wheels with a triple zero space ā€” I wonā€™t explain that one in depth but for my gamblers out there, stay away from the triple zero wheels, theyā€™re statistical disasters.

But unlike Vegas, creators can actually win in the content casino we find ourselves in. It requires a media savvy that few are willing or able to teach (besides us, of course), a serious commitment to your audience and your craft, and a willingness to collectively say no when the terms of a deal arenā€™t right. 

The platforms are the house, and they will write all the rules that make it easy for them to win while we keep spinning the algorithmic wheel of fortune, but the advertisers are the ones placing the bets on our content. Building real, face-to-face relationships with the people behind those brands is how you can short circuit the platformā€™s algorithmic power over your revenue share. And perhaps once brands get to know you, theyā€™ll be less likely to want to replace your UGC with AIGC. 

No promises, though. Brands will always want cheap content and bonafide attention from a partner they trust, and if CES showed us anything, AI is going to be mighty good at making things cheap and engaging. Your advantage here lies in building that trust, so when the brands go to place their bets, theyā€™ll hopefully keep betting on you.


NOTED BY LON HARRIS

MrBeast Started Posting Videos to Twitter/X. Could the Platform Be a Viable Home for Creators?

mrbeast x twitter advertisers videos

IN THE BIZ


CULTURE

Skibidi Toliet Is Under Investigation By Russian Authorities

The popular YouTube series may be under threat.

By Charlotte Colombo, Passionfruit Contributor


PLATFORMS

facebook gaming simulcasting

Facebook Gaming Lifts Simulcasting Restrictions

ā€˜Huge news for the 8 people watching Facebook Gaming right now.ā€™

By Charlotte Colombo, Passionfruit Contributor


WHAT WE’RE WATCHING


TWITCH MADE ME DO IT

Content for Creators.

News, tips, and tricks delivered to your inbox twice a week.

Newsletter Signup

Latest Newsletters

  • šŸ’°Personal Finance TikTok Is No Boys Club

    šŸ’°Personal Finance TikTok Is No Boys Club

    CREATOR ECONOMY NEWSLETTER Issue 64 | September 1, 2022 Personal finance can be a difficult subject to understand, and financial content has historically catered to men. According to one study, language around financial advice for men and women differ greatly. Traditional finance media often frames women as “excessive shoppers” who need to cut their spending…

  • šŸ”® TikTokers Want To Manifest a Way Out of Dystopia

    šŸ”® TikTokers Want To Manifest a Way Out of Dystopia

    CREATOR ECONOMY NEWSLETTER Issue 63 | August 30, 2022 To say weā€™re living in a time of great uncertainty isā€¦ an understatement. As we navigate an economic downturn, among various other disasters, many TikTok users have tried their luck with manifestation sounds to take some control of their lives. While the state of the world…

  • šŸ’¼ This Former YouTuber Can Help Expand Your Reach

    šŸ’¼ This Former YouTuber Can Help Expand Your Reach

    CREATOR ECONOMY NEWSLETTER Issue 62 | August 25, 2022 Itā€™s not easy to step away from a successful YouTube career. Cat Valdes, better known online as Catrific, was an early YouTuber who rose to fame alongside vloggers like Dan Howell, Phil Lester, Joey Graceffa, and Shane Dawson. Over time, Valdes found that her heart wasnā€™t…