YouTube Strikes Again with Copyright Cover Claims

CREATOR NEWSLETTER


Presented by:

Another day, another Skynet situation over at YouTube, the video “sharing” platform that’s got about as much interest in sharing as a kindergarten bully hoarding Hot Wheels during indoor recess. The Google-owned site takes a real liberal read of the word Merriam’s Dictionary defines as “to partake of, use, experience, occupy, or enjoy with others” but also “to distribute on the Internet,” as it increasingly allows its users to do neither.

Lon did a great piece below companies training large language models off of YouTube data, you can read about it here. But as for Google’s own arsenal of AI-developed tools, they are some of the worst on offer. Say what you will about Bing AI’s tendency to go all “Fatal Attraction”, but Microsoft CoPilot isn’t telling kids to drink urine or bleach as a cure for kidney stones.

Case in point: YouTube’s automated Content ID tool, which, in theory, protects creators from the theft of their intellectual property. In practice, it’s just as likely to misidentify original works as *intense Gollum voice*  “someone’s precious content,” a.k.a. copyrighted material. (In my headcanon, all copyright lawyers are huge LOTR nerds. It tracks and you know it.)


THE COMMENTS SECTION


Once YouTube automatically detects its precious, it can and will take matters into its own robotic hands by either privatizing the video or allowing it to remain public but keeping any revenue generated in escrow, which I can only assume is a cave somewhere in Mordor. The claimed video’s analytics are not visible during this time, so uploaders don’t even have a sense of how much money may be waiting for them upon resolution. The only recourse is to file a dispute, in the hopes that the party YouTube is filing on behalf of will see the notification and, feeling generous, log on to manually release the claim. Meanwhile, your video and its revenue could be in limbo for up to 28 days while the dispute winds its way through YouTube’s lugubrious human review process.

The platform is far from the only offender here in terms of the auto-flag function, but its impact may be the most heavily weighted against creators. Elon Musk may have replaced X’s press team with an auto-response of a poop emoji, but it’s still 100x more effective as a platform to shame brands into giving you personalized attention, as was the case this week when the creator behind the popular indie animated channel Lackadaisy took YouTube to task for auto-flagging an upload featuring an original cover of a song in the public domain. Not even the song itself, but a cover of it. The funds were being withheld pending a manual investigation. Lackadaisy had one million subscribers to its channel and no means of contacting a human at YouTube.

“I know you can publish a video with claims on it, but if you can’t meaningfully monetize (i.e. tag products) during the timeframe during which the video is relevant (typically the first 24-48 hours), well…that’s extremely damaging,” wrote the series creator @LackadaisyTracy in a follow-up post, adding that spending 30 days waiting for a claim to expire would be a “slow suffocation” for any production studio.

YouTube responded with not one but two auto-generated replies, and the thread went viral. Twenty minutes later, they issued another, decent approximation of a human typo-laden response: “apologies for how frustrating this has been. heard back & the Content ID claim was invalid. the claim has been removed from your video. lmk if you need anything else.” Dabs to the social intern who actually managed to cut through the red tape over at YouTube and will most likely be replaced by ChatGPT this time next year.

The problem is twofold: Not every creator has an audience on other platforms that can be leveraged into forcing an escalation of a specific case. But even when they do, a win today is no guarantee of a victory tomorrow, as Jenny Nicholson can attest, at which point they may very well have to start the whole process over from scratch.

On a separate and more uplifting note, YouTube unveiled new guidelines this month that offer some protections to some creators by allowing participants in its YouTube Partner Program a 7-day grace window to file a dispute on manual copyright strikes, which work on a 3-strike suspension policy. This is important since the partner channel can remain monetized during the process (though the video in question could be privatized or have its revenue withheld), chilling the auto-ban incentive for bad actors issuing multiple strikes against a creator simultaneously.


LABOR

Hijacking YouTube: The Unseen Data Theft from Your Favorite Creators

Robot on laptop with youtube open and youtube logos floating in the background

START YOUR BEAUTY LINE TODAY 

Blanka lets anyone create their own branded makeup or skincare line and
generate income. Choose from hundreds of products that you can brand,
customize and sell on your IG/TikTok. When you get orders, Blanka ships your orders to your customers, so you never have to deal with inventory. 


IN THE BIZ


CULTURE

Creators Descend On the Republican National Convention

More than 100 creators are attending the event. 

By Charlotte Colombo, Passionfruit Contributor


TIPS & TRICKS

How To Set up Donations on Twitch To Be Blessed By Your Viewers

Let your viewers drop something in the tip jar. 

By merritt k, Passionfruit Contributor


WHAT WE’RE WATCHING


MEME BREAK

Content for Creators.

News, tips, and tricks delivered to your inbox twice a week.

Newsletter Signup

Latest Newsletters

  • Older Creators Challenge Ageism

    Older Creators Challenge Ageism

    CREATOR ECONOMY NEWSLETTER Issue 39 | May 12, 2022 The creator economy is often viewed as a young person’s industry. However, while Gen Z is a dominant force on social media, plenty of older creators are challenging the notion of who gets to be successful online. From content houses for retirees to a mega-popular cooking…